CROSS-TEAM WORKFLOW

An escalation brief everyone can trust.

Linkence reconstructs the escalation across mail, tickets, chat, and engineering (with citations) so support, engineering, and leadership work from the same facts.

Book a demo on your data View all solutions

Starts withAn active customer escalation

Grounds inMail, tickets, chat, and engineering, cited

ProducesA cited escalation brief with owners and open items

Human gateRead-only: no system writes on this path

THE STARTING FRICTION

The escalation is everywhere. The story is nowhere.

The customer thread is in mail, the ticket in Zendesk, the internal discussion in Slack, and the bug in Jira. Each team sees its own slice, and the handoff loses the plot.

So leadership gets a summary that does not match the ticket, engineering gets a bug without the customer's words, and the customer gets a different story each time.

01
Each team sees only its own slice of the escalation.
02
Handoffs lose context and commitments.
03
The customer hears a different story each time.

ONE SCENARIO, END TO END

See Customer Escalations work a real ask.

It starts with a plain-English question.

No query syntax, no digging through tabs. The ask is stated the way a person would say it.

The asklive from approved scope

Summarise the Atlas Retail escalation: what happened, what we promised, and what is still open.

Linkence reads across the connected sources in scope before it answers.

Gmail

Zendesk

Slack

Jira

THE DECISION BOUNDARY

Clear about what Linkence does, and what stays with you.

Linkence handles

Reconstructing the escalation across channels
Citing every claim to its source
Mapping open items to owners and tickets
Tracking the commitments that were made

You control

The customer relationship and its decisions
What is prioritised and committed
The resolution and its communication
What gets promised next

HOW IT RUNS

The workflows behind Customer Escalations.

Brief executives

Leadership needs the escalation in one page

GmailZendeskJira

A cited brief: status, commitments, owners

The owner confirms before it goes up

Hand off to engineering

Support needs engineering on the case

ZendeskSlackJira

A cited handoff with the customer's words

Engineering confirms scope and priority

Track promised fixes

A commitment was made to the customer

GmailJira

Open commitments mapped to the work

The owner decides when to follow up

PILOT MEASURES

How to tell Customer Escalations is working.

Time to a cited escalation brief
Sources covered per handoff
Promised follow-ups with a named owner
Reopened escalations from lost context

SYSTEMS INVOLVED

The systems Customer Escalations reads and writes.

Direct answers about Customer Escalations.

Every answer reflects how the product actually behaves, never generalised.

Does this replace our support team?+

No. It gives support, engineering, and leadership the same cited facts so they can resolve the escalation. The customer relationship and its decisions stay with your team.

Where does the summary come from?+

From the mail thread, the Zendesk ticket, the internal Slack channel, and the Jira bug, every claim cited so anyone can open the source.

Can it track what we promised the customer?+

Yes. It surfaces the commitments made and maps them to the work in progress, so follow-ups have a named owner.

SEE CUSTOMER ESCALATIONS ON YOUR DATA

Bring Customer Escalations into one governed workflow.

We will show how Linkence finds the relevant context, presents the work and keeps every sensitive change under your team's control.