Linkence searches the Slack and Teams channels you choose to index (with Jira, Outlook, and SharePoint context) and reconstructs the decision, the timeline, and what is still open.
The call was made in a thread, the reasoning in a reply, and the follow-up in a different channel entirely. Chat search finds keywords, not decisions.
So the same questions get re-litigated, and new joiners never learn why anything was decided.
Decisions are buried across threads and channels.
Chat search finds keywords, not outcomes.
Context is split between Slack, Teams, and the ticket.
No query syntax, no digging through tabs. The ask is stated the way a person would say it.
A past call needs to be confirmed or defended
The decision, who made it, and when, cited
A participant confirms the readingAn incident needs a post-hoc narrative
A cited timeline from first signal to resolution
The incident owner validates before sharingSomeone joins a project mid-flight
The context and decisions so far, cited
A teammate confirms anything unclearEvery answer reflects how the product actually behaves, never generalised.
No. You choose which channels are indexed. It is targeted retrieval over channels you approve, not broad surveillance.
Yes. It reconstructs the decision, the timeline, and what is still open, citing the thread, the confirmation, and any linked ticket.
Yes. It searches the indexed channels across both, with Jira, Outlook, and SharePoint context where relevant.
We will show how Linkence finds the relevant context, presents the work and keeps every sensitive change under your team's control.
Representative data is enough for the first demo. No production access required.