Linkence searches across your SharePoint sites and libraries (with Teams, Outlook, and OneDrive context) and answers with the library, file, and section cited.
The runbook is in a library somewhere, the decision is in a Teams channel, and the latest copy is on someone's OneDrive. Native search returns a wall of files with the same name.
So people download three versions, guess which is current, and move on, hoping they picked right.
Native search returns files, not answers.
Version sprawl makes the current copy ambiguous.
Context lives in Teams and Outlook, outside the library.
No query syntax, no digging through tabs. The ask is stated the way a person would say it.
Someone needs the authoritative procedure
The current document with library and version cited
The asker confirms it is the authoritative copyA question is answered inside a long document
The specific section, cited to file and page
The reader opens the source to confirm contextA Teams meeting needs the relevant documents
A brief with the governed documents cited
The organiser confirms it before sharingEvery answer reflects how the product actually behaves, never generalised.
Yes. Retrieval honours site and library permissions, so people only get answers from content they can already access.
Native search returns files. Linkence returns an answer with the library, file, and section cited, and adds the Teams and Outlook context that native search cannot see.
It surfaces the current version and flags superseded copies, citing both so a person can confirm.
We will show how Linkence finds the relevant context, presents the work and keeps every sensitive change under your team's control.
Representative data is enough for the first demo. No production access required.