Linkence reads the operational record across your connected systems, prepares the next step with citations, and acts only after a named approver signs off.
Every action is prepared from cited sources and gated by a named approver.The request is in chat, the SOP in SharePoint, the ticket in Jira, and the update needs to go back to the customer by email. The operator is the integration, copying context between tools and hoping nothing is dropped.
So follow-through depends on memory, approvals happen in side channels, and nobody can prove what was done or why.
Context is copied between tools by hand.
Approvals happen in side channels with no record.
Nobody can prove what was done, or why.
No query syntax, no digging through tabs. The ask is stated the way a person would say it.
A request or delay crosses an SOP threshold
A cited escalation, posted after approval
The named approver signs offSomeone needs the current procedure
The current SOP, cited
The operator confirms it appliesA system of record needs the outcome
A verified update in the system of record
The approver confirms before it postsAn action has a deadline
Open items with owners and dates
The owner closes the loopEvery answer reflects how the product actually behaves, never generalised.
No. It prepares the next step with citations and acts only after a named approver signs off. Every action records what was done and why.
Only the ones you approve, and only after explicit review, for example posting to a Slack channel or updating a Jira ticket. Retrieval sources like SharePoint SOPs stay read-only.
Each action is tied to its cited sources and the named approver, so there is a record of what was done, when, and why.
We will show how Linkence finds the relevant context, presents the work and keeps every sensitive change under your team's control.
Representative data is enough for the first demo. No production access required.