Linkence reads the account thread, the meetings, and the proposal, drafts the follow-up with citations, and sends it only after you approve, while Deadlines keep every commitment visible.
Every follow-up is drafted from the record and sent only after approval.What was promised is in an email, the next step in a calendar invite, and the proposal in Drive. Writing the follow-up means reconstructing all three from memory, so it slips, or goes out missing the point.
Renewals, demos, and procurement steps all have dates. Nobody is tracking all of them.
Follow-ups are written from memory, not the record.
Commitments are scattered across mail, calendar, and files.
Renewal and procurement dates slip silently.
No query syntax, no digging through tabs. The ask is stated the way a person would say it.
A renewal or demo needs a follow-up
A cited draft, sent after approval
The rep reviews and approves before sendPromises were made across the cycle
Open commitments with dates and owners
The rep decides when to actA bulk send needs to be relevant
Personalised drafts, approval-gated
The rep approves each batchEvery answer reflects how the product actually behaves, never generalised.
No. It drafts follow-ups from the account record, with citations, and sends only after you review and approve. Outreach mode stays approval-gated too.
It surfaces what was promised across mail and meetings and tracks each commitment with a date and owner through Deadlines, so renewals and procurement steps do not slip.
The account thread in Gmail or Outlook, the meetings in calendar, and the proposal or account files in Drive, cited on the draft.
We will show how Linkence finds the relevant context, presents the work and keeps every sensitive change under your team's control.
Representative data is enough for the first demo. No production access required.