FOR ENGINEERING TEAMS

Why did we roll back? Get the cited answer.

Linkence searches your repos, tickets, wikis, and chat together, and reconstructs the technical narrative (the PR, the incident, the decision) with citations.

Book a demo on your data View all solutions

Every technical claim cites the PR, ticket, or page it came from.

Starts withA technical question about a system or change

Grounds inRepos, tickets, wikis, and chat, cited

ProducesA cited technical narrative

Human gateRead-only: no system writes on this path

THE STARTING FRICTION

The context is in five tools. The answer is in none.

The code is in GitHub, the ticket in Jira, the runbook in Confluence, and the incident discussion in Slack. Understanding one deploy means opening all four and reading for an hour.

So engineers interrupt each other, or guess, and the same incident gets debugged twice.

01
Technical context is split across repos, tickets, wikis, and chat.
02
Reconstructing an incident means reading four tools.
03
The reasoning behind a change is lost with the author.

ONE SCENARIO, END TO END

See Engineering work a real ask.

It starts with a plain-English question.

No query syntax, no digging through tabs. The ask is stated the way a person would say it.

ScenarioNorthstar Services · Project AtlasFictional demo data, not a customer result.

The asklive from approved scope

Why did we roll back the payments deploy in June, and what changed before the re-release?

Linkence reads across the connected sources in scope before it answers.

GitHub

Jira

Confluence

Slack

THE DECISION BOUNDARY

Clear about what Linkence does, and what stays with you.

Linkence handles

Searching repos, tickets, wikis, and chat together
Reconstructing the technical narrative with citations
Mapping an incident to the change that caused it

You control

The diagnosis and the fix
Whether a prepared update is applied
Any communication about the incident

HOW IT RUNS

The workflows behind Engineering.

Reconstruct an incident

An incident needs a post-hoc narrative

GitHubJiraSlack

A cited timeline from change to resolution

The incident owner validates before sharing

Understand a change

A deploy or PR needs context

GitHubConfluence

The change, its reasoning, and its fallout, cited

The engineer confirms the reading

Prepare a Jira update

Findings should be recorded on the ticket

GitHubSlack

A prepared update for review

The engineer approves before it is posted

PILOT MEASURES

How to tell Engineering is working.

Time to reconstruct an incident or change
Questions answered without interrupting an engineer
Narratives citing the PR, ticket, and runbook

SYSTEMS INVOLVED

The systems Engineering reads and writes.

Direct answers about Engineering.

Every answer reflects how the product actually behaves, never generalised.

Which systems does it search?+

GitHub for repos and pull requests, Jira for issues, Confluence for runbooks and specs, and Slack for incident discussion, together, with citations.

Can it reconstruct why a change was made?+

Yes. It reconstructs the technical narrative (the PR, the incident, the decision), citing each source so an engineer can verify it.

Does it write to our systems?+

Search is read-only. Where a Jira update would help, it prepares one for review and posts it only after an engineer approves.

SEE ENGINEERING ON YOUR DATA

Bring Engineering into one governed workflow.

We will show how Linkence finds the relevant context, presents the work and keeps every sensitive change under your team's control.