Linkence classifies the vendor inbox, drafts replies grounded in your procurement policy, and escalates the sensitive threads, sending only after a person reviews.
Security packets, onboarding documents, and renewal questions all land in one inbox. Each answer depends on the procurement policy, which lives in SharePoint and is longer than anyone remembers.
So vendors wait, documents go missing, and the sensitive threads get the same treatment as the routine ones.
Vendor mail is answered inconsistently.
The policy is hard to apply mid-queue.
Missing documents stall onboarding.
No query syntax, no digging through tabs. The ask is stated the way a person would say it.
The vendor inbox needs sorting
A classified queue: routine vs. sensitive
A person takes the sensitive threadsOnboarding stalls on a missing item
A cited draft listing what is outstanding
Procurement reviews and approves before sendA vendor thread needs judgement, not a template
The thread routed to a person with context
Procurement decides the responseEvery answer reflects how the product actually behaves, never generalised.
No. It drafts replies grounded in your procurement policy and sends only after a person reviews. Sensitive threads escalate rather than draft.
Your procurement policy in SharePoint and your onboarding checklists in Drive, cited on the draft.
Yes. It lists the outstanding items for each vendor and drafts the follow-up, so onboarding does not stall silently.
We will show how Linkence finds the relevant context, presents the work and keeps every sensitive change under your team's control.
Representative data is enough for the first demo. No production access required.