Support Triage Coworker
Reads every new case, classifies intent, severity, account tier, sentiment, and SLA risk, retrieves the relevant sources, prepares the reply, and routes uncertain or consequential cases to the right owner.
Classify new requests, retrieve the right context, and prepare grounded replies before an agent opens the queue.
The queue is ordered by arrival, but business risk is not. An agent reads the same questions again, searches several tools for account context, asks Engineering for status, and writes another version of an answer the team has already approved before.
Every new ticket is read and routed manually.
Replies are drafted without the complete customer and engineering history.
Repeated failures look like separate tickets until the volume becomes obvious.
Reads every new case, classifies intent, severity, account tier, sentiment, and SLA risk, retrieves the relevant sources, prepares the reply, and routes uncertain or consequential cases to the right owner.
Builds a cited timeline across the ticket, email, CRM, Slack or Teams, Jira, and GitHub. Identifies the current owner, unanswered question, customer promise, and next deadline, then prepares the internal and customer-safe updates.
Groups recent tickets by likely root cause, product area, version, and customer impact. Links the cluster to open engineering work or prepares a deduplicated Jira issue when no owner exists.
Tracks questions that receive inconsistent replies, weak source coverage, or repeated escalations. Prepares the missing help-center or runbook update and routes it to the content owner.
Also runsSLA watch · Customer-health brief · CSAT theme digest · Help-center freshness review
The new case matches the configured account, severity, sentiment, and SLA rules.
The coworker joins the ticket history, account promises, related Jira issues, recent deploys, prior incidents, and current runbook.
It posts the cited internal brief, assigns or proposes the correct owners, prepares the engineering ticket, and drafts a customer-safe update.
Refunds, security statements, legal language, uncertain root cause, or a new external commitment require the named approver.
It removes repeated reading, searching, drafting, routing, and coordination. Human agents remain responsible for judgment, empathy, exceptions, new commitments, and cases outside the approved policy boundary.
Routine replies can run inside an explicitly configured policy when evidence and confidence requirements are met. Sensitive categories and uncertain cases pause for named review. The pilot begins in draft-only mode unless the team deliberately approves more autonomy.
The coworker retrieves from the approved policy, help content, prior resolutions, account history, and related engineering work. The draft carries source links so an agent can inspect why it was prepared.
Start with triage if queue delay is the bottleneck. Start with the Escalation Coordinator if senior agents spend their time rebuilding context across systems.
The large number is after Linkence. The line underneath is the same metric before.
We will configure the categories, evidence sources, routing rules, approval boundary, and owner, then run the Support Coworker against the queue.